Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Richard Gabb vs Ramkumar Ramanathan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gabb vs Ramanathan analysis and find out who is favored!
Richard Gabb vs Ramkumar Ramanathan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gabb 1 - 1 Ramanathan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gabb has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ramanathan has won 52.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gabb, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ramanathan has won 48.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gabb has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ramanathan has saved 70.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gabb has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ramanathan winning 63.93% (W/L 39/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gabb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 144/ 101), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20). Ramanathan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 200), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 28/ 41).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gabb winning 1 times and Ramanathan being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gabb winning 2 and Ramanathan winning 3. The last match between Gabb and Ramanathan was at the Qatar F5, 08-12-2014, Semifinals, Hard with Ramkumar Ramanathan getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gabb and Ramanathan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gabb winning 1 times and Ramanathan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gabb winning 0, and Ramanathan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gabb has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ramanathan has played against players with an average rank of 219.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gabb has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ramanathan has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gabb has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ramanathan has converted 37.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
410
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
329
Rank
111
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
55% (236-195)
Career Total W/L
54% (434-377)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$710
Career Prize Money
$416,385
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Richard Gabb vs Ramkumar Ramanathan For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gabb VS Ramanathan
Sportsbook
Offer
Gabb VS Ramanathan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Richard Gabb | Ramkumar Ramanathan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 19 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Gabb VS Ramanathan H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 1-6 6-4 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Richard Gabb | Ramkumar Ramanathan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (41/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (388/351) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (18/14) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.67 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 241 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 251.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1312/2132) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 74% (977/1312) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (427/820) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 37% (65/174) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (753/2108) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (9/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 82% (9/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (19/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 23% (3/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (15/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (15/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 21% (19/4) |
Richard Gabb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Luke Johnson
Player
Richard Gabb
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
52
Total Points Won
47
|
4-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Johan Sebastien Tatlot
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Ortega-Olmedo
Player
Richard Gabb
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Sebastien Tatlot
Player
Richard Gabb
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Karl Friberg
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Jules Okala
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Richard Gabb
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Jordan Hasson
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Richard Gabb
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Igor Smilansky
Player
Richard Gabb
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
18 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ramkumar Ramanathan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
10
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
17
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
129)
10
Aces
27
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
59 of
77)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
28 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
43 of
129)
119
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Ulises Blanch
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Yshai Oliel
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
15
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
6 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Bang Shuo Yin
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabb Vs Ramanathan Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gabb are available here and Ramanathan photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
